DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015001901-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-11

000122615

Contested design: 015001901-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150019010001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Heisai Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

306B, 3F, Plant 2, Haochuang Longhua Industrial Park, 95 Yousong Road, Fukang Community, Longhua Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Fanwo E-commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

3605G16, Adong, Xingheshiji, Caitianlu3069hao, Gangxiashequ, Futianjiedao, Futianqu, Shenzhen 518026, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2

anti-insect screen

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B00I94I53I?th=1 (ASIN B00I94I53I) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2013-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested anti-insect screen lacked individual character over earlier anti-insect screen disclosures, particularly D2 on Amazon from 18/09/2013.
  • The holders argued that the finer mesh and greater transparency of the contested design created a different overall impression when the screens were installed.
  • The Division accepted D2 as disclosed, found average designer freedom, and held that the shared rectangular screen, light mesh, and similarly placed zipper dominated the overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holders were ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258