DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006269254-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-12

000124895

Contested design: 006269254-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 006269254-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amacoa GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bierstraße 8-9, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Reapow Technology Co.,Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Unit 2508a 25/F Bank Of America Tower 12 Harcourt Rd Central, Hong Kong 999077 Hong Kong

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

teapot warmer

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B06WRWQ5DR) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-02-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that an identical teapot warmer had been sold on Amazon before the contested design's filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon material as sufficient proof of prior online disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • The Division found the earlier design was not identical because undisclosed bottom and internal features of the contested design could not be treated as immaterial differences, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077