DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002237495-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-20

000120365

Contested design: 002237495-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 002237495-0005 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DewertOkin GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Weststr. 1, 32278 Kirchlengern, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Motion S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Biondini, 27, 47121 Forlì (FC), Italia

Represented by

IP Consulting BO

Alberto Laghi

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested movement device is a component of a complex product that is not visible during normal use under Article 4(2) CDR.
  • It also argued that all essential features are solely dictated by technical function, especially footrest movement and finger-pinch protection, so Article 8(1) CDR bars protection.
  • The holder filed no separate observations recorded in the decision; the Division assessed the applicant’s annexes and the product’s visibility during normal use.
  • The Division found the articulated telescopic arms remain visible from lateral and frontal views, especially when the footrest is extended, so the visibility requirement is met.
  • It further found the applicant had not proved that all essential features were exclusively dictated by technical function; the invalidity application was therefore rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130884

vs Yigen Yang

2026-04-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000130703

vs Biwei Lin

2026-03-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000129381

vs EQUIPMOTOR LOCOMOTION DIRECT

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000130727

vs Qiang Qian

2026-01-27Art 25(1)(b)087
000130282

vs Xiaodong SHAO

2025-12-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000114141

vs M&T 1997,a.s.

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)087
000126676

vs GH Holding Bjerre ApS

2025-09-10Art 25(1)(b)087
000125985

vs Best on Bolt GmbH

2025-05-28Art 25(1)(b)087