DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 002237495-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-20

000120365

Contested design: 002237495-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 002237495-0005 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DewertOkin GmbH

Germany (DE)

Weststr. 1, 32278 Kirchlengern, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Motion S.p.A.

Italy (IT)

Via Biondini, 27, 47121 Forlì (FC), Italia

Represented by

IP Consulting BO

Alberto Laghi

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested movement device is a component of a complex product that is not visible during normal use under Article 4(2) CDR.
  • It also argued that all essential features are solely dictated by technical function, especially footrest movement and finger-pinch protection, so Article 8(1) CDR bars protection.
  • The holder filed no separate observations recorded in the decision; the Division assessed the applicant’s annexes and the product’s visibility during normal use.
  • The Division found the articulated telescopic arms remain visible from lateral and frontal views, especially when the footrest is extended, so the visibility requirement is met.
  • It further found the applicant had not proved that all essential features were exclusively dictated by technical function; the invalidity application was therefore rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130884

vs Yigen Yang

2026-04-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000130703

vs Biwei Lin

2026-03-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000129381

vs EQUIPMOTOR LOCOMOTION DIRECT

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000130727

vs Qiang Qian

2026-01-27Art 25(1)(b)087
000130282

vs Xiaodong SHAO

2025-12-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000114141

vs M&T 1997,a.s.

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)087
000126676

vs GH Holding Bjerre ApS

2025-09-10Art 25(1)(b)087
000125985

vs Best on Bolt GmbH

2025-05-28Art 25(1)(b)087