DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005746500-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-30

000123282

Contested design: 005746500-0002

CDRRCD lapsed at decision

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0057465000002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wera Nova s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Jankovcova 1587/8, 17000 Praha 7 – Holešovice, Czechia

Represented by

Zdeněk Kučera

Holder · RCD owner

J.A.D. Food s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Uničovská 1324/21, 78401 Litovel, Czechia

Prior art cited (6)

Registered RCD

wafer roll

RCD No 0015163940002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-07-16

Trade mark

wafer roll sign

EUTM No 8 306 672 · European Union Trade Marks Bulletin · disclosed 2009-12-07

Registered RCD

wafer roll

RCD No 0015163940001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-07-16

Registered RCD

wafer roll

RCD No 0015163940003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-07-16

Registered RCD

wafer roll

RCD No 0015163940004 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-07-16

Registered RCD

wafer roll

RCD No 0015163940005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-07-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested wafer-roll design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier RCDs and EUTM depicting the same product.
  • The holder did not contest the merits and instead argued the invalidity action was pointless because it would not renew the contested design.
  • The Division held that lapse did not bar a merits decision, accepted the earlier published rights as prior disclosures, and assessed individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • It found the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier wafer-roll design, so the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018