DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009085996-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-04

000125998

Contested design: 009085996-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009085996-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yuan Huangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

603, Building 46, Fifth Industrial Zone, Huaidecuigang, Fuyong Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Affargo LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

27, Old Gloucester Street, LONDON WC1N 3AX United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

set of colourful clamp clips

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B01NAWVFPH?th=1 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-02-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Amazon-disclosed clamp clips predating the contested design.
  • The applicant submitted an Amazon.de product page for colourful clips showing first availability on 3 February 2017 and ASIN B01NAWVFPH.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and comparison were unrebutted.
  • The Division found the prior clips had been validly disclosed online and differed only in immaterial colour-shade details, so the contested design lacked novelty and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088