DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008780571-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-08

000125955

Contested design: 008780571-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008780571-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tierra Outdoor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gewerbepark Antrup 11, 49525 Lengerich, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Caoxian Yuning Home Decor Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Linzhuang Village, Ancailou Town, Cao County, Heze City (Shandong Province) 274400, China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureEvidence 1

still showing the applicant's Valencia outdoor lounge armchair design

YouTube video Tierra Outdoor Valencia Loungeserie · YouTube / Gartenmöbel Company · disclosed 2019-11-18

CatalogEvidence 2

catalog pages showing the applicant's Valencia outdoor lounge armchair design

Tierra outdoor 2019 · Tierra Outdoor catalog · disclosed 2019-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested armchair design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier Valencia lounge design disclosed before 30 November 2021.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, similarity, or the invalidity grounds.
  • The Division accepted the 18 November 2019 YouTube still and the 2019 catalog extracts as sufficient disclosure of the earlier design under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division found only minor color and cushion differences, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068