DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008835540-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-15

000124856

Contested design: 008835540-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008835540-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at 350 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amacoa GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bierstraße 8-9, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Songgang Sports Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Wanda plaza, A 1109, No.9 Xinke Road, Yiwu city, Zhejiang province China

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

pull-up bar offer on Amazon

https://www.amazon.de/; ASIN B0797WRPDV · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-01-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the pull-up bar design lacked novelty and individual character and was dictated by technical function because a similar product had been sold since January 2018.
  • Applicant relied on Amazon evidence for D1, including a product printout, hyperlink, and ASIN showing availability from 23 January 2018.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed and found the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor handle and stripe differences.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b), so the RCD was declared invalid and other pleaded grounds were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberBenjamin van BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218