DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015019802-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-15

000125336

Contested design: 015019802-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015019802-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yuyao Hllite Electric Co.,Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

CE23, Far East Industrial Park, Yuyao City – Zhejiang Prov 315400, China

Holder · RCD owner

Yingzi Wu

China (CN)

No. 4 Wulongwan, Kongguan Village, Huarong District DuanDian Town, Ezhou City, Hubei Province, China

Represented by

Asterney S.L

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

table lamp marketed by Mexong Ltd. and reproduced in the Düsseldorf Regional Court decision

Mexong Ltd. lamp; Düsseldorf Regional Court file 14c O 75/22; https://www.ficession.com · Germany / https://www.ficession.com / Düsseldorf Regional Court · disclosed 2022-09-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier Mexong lamp disclosed before the contested design's filing date.
  • Applicant argued the contested table lamp copied the earlier lamp and produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Mexong lamp through website advertising and sale in Germany by at least 8 September 2022.
  • Finding no different overall impression under Article 6 CDR, the Division upheld the application and invalidated the contested design.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268