DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015054451-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-23

000125355

Contested design: 015054451-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 015054451-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015054451-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dongguan Jinhong Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 101, No. 2, Shixin Xingye Street Zhangmutou Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm.102, Bldg. D,Bantian Int. Center, No.5 Huancheng So. Rd., Ma'antang Com., Bantian St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen 518129, China

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

teething ring

CN 308505665 S · Chinese design patent publication · disclosed 2024-03-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested design lacked novelty or individual character over an earlier Chinese design patent.
  • To support the challenge, the applicant filed Chinese design patent No CN 308505665 S with an English translation and a Designview extract; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the Chinese patent had been validly disclosed before filing and that designers of teething rings enjoy a high degree of freedom.
  • Because the designs matched in shape and surface features and differed essentially only in colour, the prior design destroyed individual character and the application was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123575

vs Lizhen Yu

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248