DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015029385-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-24

000123775

Contested design: 015029385-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No. 015029385-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 015029385-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jing Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 11 Shangliutang, Lixi Village, Longtian Town,, Xingning, Guangdong Provinz, China

Represented by

H&A

Holder · RCD owner

Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

Germany (DE)

Hanns-Martin-Schleyer-Str. 5, 47877 Willich-Münchheide, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

profile / ceramic discharge electrode / electrode design shown in the Chinese design registration extract

CN307191318S (application No. 202130641497.6) · China design registration extract · disclosed 2022-03-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier disclosed designs D1 to D4, relying in particular on Chinese design D1.
  • The holder argued that the contested design was new and had individual character and that disclosure of D1 to D3 had not been proven from the submitted documents and translations.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed through the publication date identified by INID code 45 and found designer freedom somewhat constrained but still sufficient for meaningful comparison.
  • The shared U-shaped and pi-like profile structure and ribbed side surfaces dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.0324.0125.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138