DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015006513-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-03

000129321

Contested design: 015006513-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; registered EU design No 015006513-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015006513-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mkto Catal Importaciones, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Pulpi (Almería), Spanien

Represented by

Lerroux

Holder · RCD owner

Meinhard Mombauer

Germany (DE)

Köln, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

DolDer 60-W-USB-Typ-C-Kabel charger/cable organiser case (round form)

ASIN B09NJKH6CB, https://www.amazon.es · Amazon.es · disclosed 2022-01-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued lack of novelty and individual character: the contested charger/cable-organiser case design (filed 16/12/2022, round disc form) is identical or lacks individual character compared to the prior design D1 (DolDer cable case on Amazon.es since 15/01/2022), sharing the same circular overall form, white casing, internal compartments for cables and adapters, and similar connector arrangement.
  • Holder argued the differences in the outer disc-shape (flat disc with peripheral silicone ring), rotating lid mechanism and attached ring/key loop confer a distinctive overall impression; it also argued market saturation in round housings but submitted no adequate evidence.
  • The Division found broad designer freedom, found no sufficient evidence of market saturation, then compared the designs and found them to coincide in all key structural features (circular form, white casing, identical interior layout with cables and four small plus one large adapter/connector); the differences (silicone edge, ring, lid mechanism, darker interior) were insufficient to create a different overall impression.
  • Application upheld; the contested design lacks individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR; the holder bears EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV
  • MemberIvan PRANDZHEV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0113.0213.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132485

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-06-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138