Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-03
000129321
Contested design: 015006513-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld; registered EU design No 015006513-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015006513-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Mkto Catal Importaciones, S.L.via PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Pulpi (Almería), Spanien
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Meinhard Mombauer
Germany (DE)
Köln, Germany
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
DolDer 60-W-USB-Typ-C-Kabel charger/cable organiser case (round form)
ASIN B09NJKH6CB, https://www.amazon.es · Amazon.es · disclosed 2022-01-15
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant argued lack of novelty and individual character: the contested charger/cable-organiser case design (filed 16/12/2022, round disc form) is identical or lacks individual character compared to the prior design D1 (DolDer cable case on Amazon.es since 15/01/2022), sharing the same circular overall form, white casing, internal compartments for cables and adapters, and similar connector arrangement.
- ›Holder argued the differences in the outer disc-shape (flat disc with peripheral silicone ring), rotating lid mechanism and attached ring/key loop confer a distinctive overall impression; it also argued market saturation in round housings but submitted no adequate evidence.
- ›The Division found broad designer freedom, found no sufficient evidence of market saturation, then compared the designs and found them to coincide in all key structural features (circular form, white casing, identical interior layout with cables and four small plus one large adapter/connector); the differences (silicone edge, ring, lid mechanism, darker interior) were insufficient to create a different overall impression.
- ›Application upheld; the contested design lacks individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR; the holder bears EUR 750 in costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberIvo TSENKOV
- MemberIvan PRANDZHEV
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000132485 vs NOVOWISE LTD | 2026-06-02 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 03 | 8 |
| 000131964 vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd. | 2026-04-22 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 03 | 8 |
| 000129383 vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 13 | 8 |
| 000129363 vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 13 | 8 |
| 000129304 vs APRIMONIA Ltd. | 2026-03-25 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 03 | 8 |
| 000131764 vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd | 2026-03-19 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 13 | 8 |
| 000129921 vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD | 2026-03-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 13 | 8 |
| 000131186 vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd | 2026-03-09 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 13 | 8 |