DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008678379-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-03-25

000129304

Contested design: 008678379-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested EU design is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered EU design No 008678379-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

80-20 Commerce GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Zirndorf, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Aprimonia Ltd.via PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Sofia, Bulgaria

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Royal Walk XXL 137 cm Automatic Umbrella

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B06WGN5X92) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-02-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(1)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued both that the registered views did not show a single design under Article 3(1) and that an earlier Royal Walk umbrella disclosed on Amazon.de destroyed novelty and individual character.
  • The holder said the views consistently showed a complex product with partial and magnified views, and it disputed the Amazon evidence by claiming the listing images had been updated later.
  • The Division rejected the Article 3(1) challenge, accepted the Amazon listing as a pre-filing disclosure from 11/02/2017, and found the holder had not proven that the images were replaced during the grace period.
  • It then held that the prior and contested umbrellas created the same overall impression despite minor colour and detail differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129229

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-10-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038