DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015062178-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-23

000130547

Contested design: 015062178-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015062178-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hui Yaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yulin City, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Holder · RCD owner

Rong Hua

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Yanyun Zhang

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 3

reusable shoe wash bag

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0C5LYYKCG · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-05-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested shoe-bag design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs, including an Amazon-listed reusable shoe wash bag disclosed before filing.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR and assessed individual character on that basis.
  • Given at least average design freedom, the Division found the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated in full, and costs were fixed against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberRebecca DAVIES SANTANNA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129229

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-10-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038