DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006565883-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-16

000130204

Contested design: 006565883-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 006565883-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

P. J. Tekstil Sp. z o. o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Mierzyn, Poland

Represented by

Bartłomiej Henryk Tomaszewski

Holder · RCD owner

Wittchen S.A.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Czosnów, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

National design

suitcase

Chinese design patent No 305006095 · WIPO database · disclosed 2019-01-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying among other things on an earlier Chinese design publication for a suitcase.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the earlier Chinese design had been made available to the public before the filing date and that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested EU design was declared invalid; novelty did not need to be examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129229

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-10-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038