DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015053401-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-25

000126162

Contested design: 015053401-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015053401-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nintendo of Europe SEvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Goldsteinstrasse 235, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Huizhou Ronghui Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Dazhou First Industrial Zone, Liboshui Village, Boluo County, Shiwan Town, China

Represented by

Dimitris Morides

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureEnclosure 3

News article "Nintendo Switch launches on 3rd March!" showing the earlier disclosed set of detachable game controllers for the Nintendo Switch.

https://www.nintendo.co.uk · Nintendo website · disclosed 2017-01-13

Web disclosureEnclosure 6

Article "Here's everything we just learned about Nintendo's new $300 console, the Switch" showing the earlier disclosed set of detachable game controllers.

https://www.businessinsider.com · Business Insider · disclosed 2017-01-13

OtherEnclosure 7

Overview of design corpus for game control pads submitted on designer freedom.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested game control pad design lacked individual character over its earlier disclosed Nintendo Switch detachable controllers and also invoked lack of novelty.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the online disclosures as prior art under Article 7(1) CDR and assessed individual character first for procedural economy.
  • It found the pad shape, ergonomic back portion, and overall button layout so similar that the added buttons and surface pattern did not change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca Julia SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218