DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015043854-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-06

000125856

Contested design: 015043854-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015043854-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Signal Meble spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością spółka komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Jana Kilińskiego 35B, 27400 Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Poland

Represented by

Klaudia Błach-Morysińska

Holder · RCD owner

Marta Krzyśków

Poland (PL)

Byczyńska 85, 46-203 Kluczbork, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

chair under the name 'CHIC' shown in the applicant's 2020 catalogue

https://signal.pl · signal.pl / WayBackMachine internet archive · disclosed 2020-07-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested chair design lacked novelty and individual character in light of its earlier CHIC chair disclosed in its 2020 catalogue and on its website.
  • The applicant also said the holder had previously sold the applicant's chairs during an earlier commercial relationship and then continued selling identical chairs after that cooperation ended.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the WayBackMachine-backed website and catalogue evidence as prior disclosure as of 2 July 2020 and found the minor differences insufficient to change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the Division did not examine the novelty ground further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068