DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015034299-0016

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-06

000126296

Contested design: 015034299-0016

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015034299-0016 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ruxian Huangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 504, No.20 Helong 2nd Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Dan Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 5 7, Group 1, Xinling Village, Guancun Town, Da County, Sichuan Province, China

Represented by

Asternery S.L

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

SENFAY 100 cm Modern LED Pendant Light offered on Amazon

ASIN B0B4NTSFHT · amazon.de · disclosed 2022-06-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Amazon disclosure of a substantially identical pendant lamp.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, comparison, or the applicant's evidence.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon webpage as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) and found a high degree of designer freedom for lamps.
  • Because the earlier and contested designs created the same overall impression, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268