DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015027233-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-07

000126039

Contested design: 015027233-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015027233-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Peng Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 603, Building 9, Hubin New City, Meijia Community, Miaoshan, Jiangxia, Wuhan, China

Holder · RCD owner

Aleaty Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 893, Pegasus House, 17 Burleys Way, Leicester LE1 3BH, United Kingdom

Represented by

Aurilex

Yaotian Chai

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Universal IR MR21GA Replacement for LG Smart TV remote control

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0B2 JPK 9HJ · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-05-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested remote control design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs, especially an Amazon-listed remote control.
  • The applicant submitted Amazon.de screenshots showing the product with ASIN B0B2 JPK 9HJ available from 27/05/2022.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient internet disclosure and found the two designs materially identical in shape, contours, proportions, and button layout.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148