DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015014827-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-12

000126169

Contested design: 015014827-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015014827-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jinfeng Minvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 69, Sunjia Village, Shengli Village Committee, Hongmei Street, Tianning District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province 213000, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yongshanfang Biotechnology Co., LTD

China (CN)

401-9, Linzhan Fortune Building, Shenfeng Road, Liuyue Community, Henggang Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

remote controls

Community design No 001828492-0001 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2011-03-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested remote control was an almost identical reproduction of an earlier Community design.
  • The applicant relied on earlier Community design No 001828492-0001 published on 03/03/2011; the holder, invited to respond as Preferred Home Limited, filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the earlier RCD as disclosed prior art and found broad designer freedom for remote controls, with only minor differences between the designs.
  • The common shape, colours, button layout, surface pattern and eyelet created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the prior design destroyed individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148