DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015030027-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-13

000125937

Contested design: 015030027-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015030027-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tierra Outdoor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gewerbepark Antrup 11, 49525 Lengerich, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Caoxian Yuning Home Decor Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Linzhuang Village, Ancailou Town, Cao County, Heze City (Shandong Province) 274400, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Composite furniture consisting of an L-shaped couch and a coffee table.

Tierra Outdoor “Valencia” Loungeserie · YouTube / Gartenmöbel Company · disclosed 2019-11-18

CatalogD2

Composite furniture from the Valencia collection consisting of an L-shaped couch and a coffee table.

Tierra outdoor 2019 · Tierra outdoor 2019 catalogue · disclosed 2019-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier Valencia outdoor furniture designs disclosed before 3 August 2023.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure or the applicant's comparison of the designs.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 from the 18 November 2019 YouTube video and D2 from the 2019 catalogue when assessed together.
  • It found the contested furniture composition produced the same overall impression as D2, so it lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068