DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015030027-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-13

000125975

Contested design: 015030027-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 015030027-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tierra Outdoor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gewerbepark Antrup 11, 49525 Lengerich, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Caoxian Yuning Home Decor Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Linzhuang Village, Ancailou Town, Cao County, Heze City (Shandong Province) 274400, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (3)

CatalogEvidence 1⚠ rejected as evidence

Catalogue extract showing the 'VALENCIA DINING CHAIR' prior design.

Tierra outdoor Collections 2021, page 101 · Tierra outdoor Collections 2021 catalogue · disclosed 2021-01-01

Web disclosureEvidence 2⚠ rejected as evidence

Screenshot of product page for the Valencia outdoor dining chair.

https://www.luense.de/tierra-outdoor-aluminium-dining-sessel-valencia-2905/ · luense.de · disclosed 2024-06-04

Web disclosureEvidence 3⚠ rejected as evidence

Wayback Machine screenshot of the same product URL, without product image or identifying details.

https://www.luense.de/tierra-outdoor-aluminium-dining-sessel-valencia-2905/ · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2022-01-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its Valencia outdoor lounge design series.
  • Holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division held the catalogue and website materials did not objectively prove disclosure of the prior design before 3 August 2023.
  • Because prior disclosure under Article 7 was not established, the Division rejected the invalidity application and awarded costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067