DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015030027-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-13

000125977

Contested design: 015030027-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015030027-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tierra Outdoor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gewerbepark Antrup 11, 49525 Lengerich, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Caoxian Yuning Home Decor Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Linzhuang Village, Ancailou Town, Cao County, Heze City (Shandong Province) 274400, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureEvidence 1

Valencia armchair from the applicant's outdoor lounge design series

YouTube video 'Tierra Outdoor “Valencia” Loungeserie' · YouTube / Gartenmöbel Company · disclosed 2019-11-18

CatalogEvidence 2

Valencia armchair and footrest composition shown on page 32

Tierra outdoor 2018 catalogue · Tierra outdoor catalogue · disclosed 2018-12-31

CatalogEvidence 3

Valencia armchair and footrest composition shown on pages 36-37

Tierra outdoor 2019 catalogue · Tierra outdoor catalogue · disclosed 2019-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier Valencia outdoor lounge design disclosures.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, novelty, or individual character.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube still and catalogue extracts as sufficient prior disclosure before 3 August 2023.
  • It found the armchair-footrest composition created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068