DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009159163-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-13

000126058

Contested design: 009159163-0012

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009159163-0012 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Peng Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 603, Building 9, Hubin New City, Meijia Community, Miaoshan, Jiangxia, Wuhan, China

Holder · RCD owner

Rui Cao

China (CN)

Room 503, Building 2, South Special Steel Living Area, Maba Avenue, Maba Town, Qujiang District, Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Replacement Philips remote control for Philips TV

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0B62V6C73 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-07-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on an Amazon listing for a Philips-compatible remote available from 8 July 2022.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations on disclosure, novelty, or individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the designer's freedom at least average.
  • It held that minor button-label differences did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148