DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015011299-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-29

000125717

Contested design: 015011299-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 015011299-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

VIPA bvbavia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Klein-Harelbekestraat 26, 8530 Hulste, Belgium

Represented by

Alexsandra Poks-Wieloik

Holder · RCD owner

Smartwood Jarosław Junikvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Łazy 103a, 37-550 Radymno, Poland

Represented by

Maria Karolina Hładyniuk-Gązwa

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

bunk beds

RCD No 005132628-0023 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-05-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing the contested bunk-bed design was identical to earlier RCD No 005132628-0023 apart from immaterial details.
  • The holder disputed the evidence links and argued the designs differed materially in the ladder, proportions, bed sides, openings, and other visible features.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD through its 8 May 2018 Community Designs Bulletin publication before the contested filing date.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found immediately perceptible differences in the oval openings, proportions, bed bases, and ladder steps, so novelty was not destroyed and the application failed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067