DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015003176-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-12-03

000124295

Contested design: 015003176-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 015003176-0002 est déclaré nul. 3. La titulaire supporte les frais, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Enterprom II - Brindes Publicitários, Ldavia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua Leite de Faria, 20, 2820-476 Charneca de Caparica, Portugal

Holder · RCD owner

Distri-Coutalevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

La Chambre, 46 700 Vire-Sur-Lot, France

Represented by

Colbert Innovation

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureDocument 1

Coutale SOMMELIER webpage showing the holder's PREMIUM corkscrew model

http://www.coutale.com · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2009-11-29

Web disclosureDocument 2

Webpage showing views of the same PREMIUM corkscrew model

http://www.gifts4wine.com · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2016-04-26

Web disclosureDocument 14

Facebook page of the holder showing the same PREMIUM corkscrew model

Facebook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the holder had disclosed the same corkscrew design before 28 November 2022 and outside the 12-month grace period, so the contested design lacked novelty.
  • Holder argued the request was inadmissible or unfounded because the evidence was insufficiently identified, some materials lacked translation or provenance, and some disclosures fell within the grace period.
  • The Division identified the PREMIUM corkscrew in documents 1, 2 and 14, accepted the web and social-media disclosures, and found disclosure proved before the grace-period start.
  • Comparing the prior PREMIUM model with the contested design, the Division found only insignificant differences in position and opening degree, so the designs were identical in relevant form.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of novelty, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle M. DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078