DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008074389-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-12-09

000120578

Contested design: 008074389-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008074389-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, DK-7190 Billund Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Jolanta Świeca

Poland (PL)

Kwiatkowskiego 2/18, 62-500 Konin Poland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon offer depicting a LEGO figurine

ASIN B01K8XHM2W · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-08-11

Trade markD2

3D mark depicting a toy figurine

EUTM No 50 450 · EUTMs Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-22

Trade markD3

3D mark depicting a toy figurine

EUTM No 50 518 · EUTMs Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier toy-figurine designs and also invoked earlier 3D EUTM rights.
  • The holder argued the figurines created a different overall impression, the market was saturated, interoperability constrained design freedom, and the earlier marks were weak or unused.
  • The Division found the cited LEGO figurine mark design disclosed before filing, rejected the claimed technical or interoperability exclusions, and held the designer's freedom for toy figurines was high.
  • Comparing the contested design mainly with D2, the Division found the same overall impression on the informed user and declared the contested design invalid without examining the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218