DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008873921-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-12-10

000125656

Contested design: 008873921-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008873921-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lego A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Aastvej 1, 7190 Billund Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Runbo Wu

China (CN)

No. 15, Lane 2, Lisanli, Huaize Village, Lianxia Town, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Maria Ioannides

Prior art cited (4)

International design

No 76 470-19

International design

No 76 470-20

Registered RCD

No 008533079-0004

Web disclosure

toy figure 'Ariel's Magical Kiss'

https://allaboutbricks.blogspot.com/2015/12/lego-review-ariels-magical-kiss-41052.html · All about bricks · disclosed 2015-12-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character and also invoked earlier international and Community design rights under Article 25(1)(d).
  • It argued the contested toy figurine was almost identical in overall impression to prior designs, including the 'Ariel's Magical Kiss' figure shown on the All about bricks blog.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the 8 December 2015 web disclosure, found high design freedom for toy figurines, and held the shared head, torso, hands, skirt, and attachment features created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218