DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006145025-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-12-11

000123975

Contested design: 006145025-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006145025-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Marcin Szymczukvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Bohaterów Września 12, 17100 Bielsk Podlaski Poland

Represented by

Chmura & Wspólnicy.

Holder · RCD owner

Blach - POL Krzysztofik., Pałyga sp.j.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Targowa 1, 26-300 Opoczno Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Sheet roofing tiles

RCD No 004557874-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin (Designview) · disclosed 2018-01-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested roof-covering design lacked individual character over earlier RCD No 004557874-0001, disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the earlier design fell within the Article 7(2) grace period and, in any event, differences in tile number, proportions, and pattern created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held the earlier RCD was validly disclosed outside the non-extendable 12-month grace period and could be considered under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the extra column and proportional differences did not outweigh the strong similarities, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258