DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002318477-0011

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-01-13

000124081

Contested design: 002318477-0011

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the registered Community design No 002318477-0011 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 002318477-0011 est déclaré nul. 3. La titulaire supporte les frais, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lichtstudio Eisenkeil GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Hoferweg 8, 6134 Vomp, Autriche

Represented by

Stefan Warbek

Holder · RCD owner

Designheurevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

5 Place Delille, 34200 Sète France

Represented by

Fidal

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnnexe D

2010 Designheure catalog showing the Nuage collection table lamp named "petit nuage blanc" on pages 9 and 10

https://www.designheure.com/download/catalogue_2010.pdf · Designheure website

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested lamp design lacked novelty because the holder had already disclosed the same design in its 2010 catalog, outside the one-year grace period before filing in October 2013.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, arguing its 2010 catalog was not reasonably known to relevant EU lighting circles, the design only became known from 2013/2014, and creation or later materials did not prove prior disclosure.
  • The Division found the 2010 PDF catalog on the holder's website was a public internet disclosure under Article 7 and that the holder did not rebut that specialized circles could reasonably have known it.
  • The Division concluded the earlier and contested designs were identical apart from insignificant details, so the contested RCD was not new and had to be declared invalid.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle M. DELACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268