DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 000579099-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-01-24

000124717

Contested design: 000579099-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 000579099-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000579099-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYI

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

ASA Selection GmbH

Germany (DE)

Rudolf-Diesel-Str. 3, 56203 Höhr-Grenzhausen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

logo shown in the DPMA database extract

deutsche Markeneintragung Nr. 2 051 011 · DPMA database · disclosed 1994-01-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier logo disclosed through German trademark registration No. 2 051 011.
  • The holder argued the filing was insufficiently substantiated and, in any event, the contested design differed through its border, proportions, typography, and the added word "GERMANY".
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier logo via the DPMA publication and treated the application as relying on a single earlier design.
  • It found the shared ASA and SELECTION composition decisive, while the border, square framing, and GERMANY element did not create a different overall impression for the informed user.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

99.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)998
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)998
000132465

vs Dan Hu

2026-06-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000131605

vs WISTRON INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD

2026-06-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000130143

vs Marek Lisiecki

2026-06-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000108310

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000108309

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000130021

vs ΛΑΡΙΠΛΑΣΤ ΑΕΒΕ

2026-06-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5