DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015057550-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-10

000125797

Contested design: 015057550-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015057550-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Promerco Import Export S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Vasile Lupu, Nr. 1, Parter, Camera Nr. 1, Comuna Tunari, Sat Tunari, Jud. Ilfov, Romania

Represented by

Adina Silviana Timonea

Holder · RCD owner

Sc Danex techmag Srl

Romania (RO)

Strada Constructorilor, Nr. 2, Bloc H1, Scara 1, Etaj 3, Ap. 17, 800365 Municipiul Galati, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Cat Early Educational Reading Card Machine

temu.com · disclosed 2024-02-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that identical educational toy card-reader designs had been disclosed online before filing, so the contested design lacked novelty and individual character.
  • Holder claimed the contested design's combination of colours, shape, and interactive features created a distinctive overall impression and challenged the reliability of the internet screenshots.
  • The Division accepted the temu.com screenshots as sufficient proof of prior disclosure because dated customer reviews showed public availability before 15/04/2024.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found only negligible differences and held that the contested design produced no different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 CDR, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218