Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-24
000125982
Contested design: 001313878-0007
Outcome
The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No 001313878-0007 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 001313878-0007 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Der Antragsteller trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Matthias Josef Wintervia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Wilhelm-Theodor-Römheld-Str. 14, 55130 Mainz, Deutschland
Holder · RCD owner
Best on Bolt GmbH
Austria (AT)
Neumarkt im Tauchental 137, 7461 Neumarkt im Tauchental, Österreich
Represented by
Prior art cited (4)
photographic depiction of a locking washer
https://www.best-on-bolt.com/ (Wayback Machine) · best-on-bolt.com / Wayback Machine · disclosed 2011-02-03
photographic depiction of a locking washer
https://www.best-on-bolt.com/ (Wayback Machine) · best-on-bolt.com / Wayback Machine · disclosed 2011-02-03
CAD depiction of a locking washer
https://www.best-on-bolt.com/ (Wayback Machine) · best-on-bolt.com / Wayback Machine · disclosed 2011-02-03
CAD depiction of a locking washer
https://www.best-on-bolt.com/ (Wayback Machine) · best-on-bolt.com / Wayback Machine · disclosed 2011-02-03
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued the contested locking-washer design was a component of a complex product and lacked novelty and individual character over D1 to D4 disclosed on an archived website.
- ›The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
- ›The Division held the applicant did not prove the washer was designed for a specific complex product, so Article 4(2) did not apply.
- ›Although D1 to D4 were accepted as disclosed before filing, differences in groove direction, outer ring shape, and proportions created a different overall impression and no identity; the application was rejected.
Deciding panel
- MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberThorsten ICKENROTH
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000130884 vs Yigen Yang | 2026-04-02 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000130703 vs Biwei Lin | 2026-03-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000129381 vs EQUIPMOTOR LOCOMOTION DIRECT | 2026-02-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000130727 vs Qiang Qian | 2026-01-27 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000130282 vs Xiaodong SHAO | 2025-12-19 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000114141 vs M&T 1997,a.s. | 2025-12-15 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000126676 vs GH Holding Bjerre ApS | 2025-09-10 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |
| 000125985 vs Best on Bolt GmbH | 2025-05-28 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 7 |