DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008810253-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-27

000125582

Contested design: 008810253-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 0088102530001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0088102530001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wei Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Fuhai Information Port Xinhe Community Fuhai Street Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Michele Carella

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jiapei Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

202, Unit 14, Yantian Haile Garden, Yantian Community, Xixiang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Dimitris Morides

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

"CMYK Pack of 2 Christmas Window Decorations", a string of lights in the shape of two five-pointed stars

ASIN B01LXTGPIJ · amazon.de · disclosed 2016-11-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon-disclosed Christmas star light-string design.
  • The holder disputed the sufficiency of the disclosure evidence and argued that differences in the wire winding, battery box, and market saturation created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as proving disclosure by 2016-11-01, rejected the crowded-sector argument for lack of proof, and found the designer enjoyed high freedom.
  • The Division found only minor battery-box differences and no meaningful visual distinction overall, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268