DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015052792-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-17

000126928

Contested design: 015052792-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015052792-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fujian Feelbaby Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

(Next to Wenzhou Avenue) Shuangyue Project Area, Fuding Industrial Park, Ningde City, Fujian Province, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Holder · RCD owner

Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

9-A279, Cross-Border Electronics Industrial Park, No. 9 Shunyi Road, Economic Development Zone, Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon listing for the item 'Scivolo per Bambini' multi-functional playset

ASIN B0C2CMZMLV · Amazon Italy (www.amazon.it) · disclosed 2023-04-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy playset lacked novelty and individual character because an identical design had already been offered for sale on Amazon Italy before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but submitted no observations.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing proved disclosure on 13/04/2023 and treated the earlier internet disclosure as prior art under Article 7 CDR.
  • Despite minor differences in module order, colours, and a basketball hoop detail, the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218