DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015052792-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-17

000126941

Contested design: 015052792-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015052792-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fujian Feelbaby Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

(Next to Wenzhou Avenue) Shuangyue Project Area, Fuding Industrial Park, Ningde City, Fujian Province, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Holder · RCD owner

Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

9-A279, Cross-Border Electronics Industrial Park, No. 9 Shunyi Road, Economic Development Zone, Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (2)

National design

Chinese registered design cited by the applicant as identical to the contested design

No 202230153740.4 · China

Web disclosureD1

Scivolo per Bambini

ASIN B0CNPTLDWT · Amazon Italy · disclosed 2023-04-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Chinese design No 202230153740.4 and Amazon Italy disclosure D1 dated 18/04/2023.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon Italy listing as a prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and considered designer freedom for multi-functional playsets not substantially limited.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor differences and held the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated in full, and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218