DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015062007-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-19

000127435

Contested design: 015062007-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015062007-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yongjia Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 41, Miaojiaqian Village, Kehu Town, Linxian County, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Suizhou Buliangren Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

301, 3rd Floor, West Unit, Taoyuan Office, Xihe Town, High-tech Zone, Suizhou, Hubei 441300, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Żuradzki

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

mobile flood protection barrier door

ASIN B09BJ3ZWLW · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant relied on an earlier Amazon disclosure from 30/07/2021 and argued that the contested flood barrier design copied it and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a valid public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the designer's freedom at least average.
  • Because the designs were nearly identical in their decisive features, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D´ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258