DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008337372-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-04-09

000125136

Contested design: 008337372-0007

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008337372-0007 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KGW UG (haftungsbeschränkt)via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hauptstraße 24, 56191 Weitersburg, Germany

Represented by

Von Bülow & Tamada

Holder · RCD owner

Lego A/S

Denmark (DK)

Aastvej 1, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

building block element from the LEGO Technic 'BMW R 1200 GS Adventure' set

Bricklink part 32249 / construction manual part 4531184 · Bricklink, supported by YouTube video 'Lego 42063 – BMW R1200 GS – Unboxing, Aufbau und Fazit' · disclosed 2018-02-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over an earlier building-block design disclosed through Bricklink and a YouTube video.
  • The holder argued the contested toy element created a different overall impression, with significant differences in shape, cutouts, thickness and structure.
  • The Division accepted disclosure based on the dated YouTube extract and the second Bricklink printout, while treating other undated or altered materials as insufficient.
  • The Division found the designer's freedom was not severely limited and the contested design produced a different overall impression, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)217
000129661

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129624

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129621

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000130709

vs Shantou Chenghai district Shuangjia plastic toy factory

2026-02-26Art 25(1)(b)217
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)217
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)217