DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 008764955-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-05

000127597

Contested design: 008764955-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered EU design No 008764955-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008764955-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Greg Sach

Germany (DE)

34H, Munich, Germany

Represented by

Greg Robert Sach

Holder · RCD owner

Mei Su

China (CN)

Zhanjiang City, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

electronic toy in the shape of a cat's face

https://www.amazon.com (ASIN B096XRJS4W) · Amazon.com · disclosed 2021-09-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested cat-shaped electronic learning toy lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Amazon-disclosed toy design available before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to submit observations on the invalidity application but did not reply.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon review-page printout and URL as sufficient proof of public disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR before the filing date.
  • Given broad design freedom for toys, the Division found the cat-face shape, central square area, and bottom slot created the same overall impression despite colour and rear-view differences.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130844

vs Lego A/S

2026-06-30Art 25(1)(b)215
000132465

vs Dan Hu

2026-06-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)215
000072551

vs Lv Cheng Liang

2026-06-26Art 25(1)(b)215
000129541

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)215
000129510

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)215
000129509

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)215
000129511

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)215
000129524

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)215