DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015012979-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-13

000127835

Contested design: 015012979-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015012979-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yuyao Hilite Electric Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yuyao City - Zhejiang Prov., China

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Mybeauty Household Products Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

table lamp marketed as 'Nuindie LED Akku Tischleuchte'

EU design No 004555001-0006 · EUIPO designs database · disclosed 2017-12-20

Web disclosure

Mexong lamp / desk lamp

https://www.ficession.com; Düsseldorf Regional Court 14c O 75/22 · ficession.com and Düsseldorf Regional Court decision · disclosed 2022-09-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested desk lamp lacked novelty and individual character in light of its earlier lamp design and the identical Mexong lamp already marketed before filing.
  • It relied on the applicant's earlier EU design registration, a 2022 Düsseldorf court decision, test-purchase photographs, and an affidavit to prove prior disclosure.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division found the Mexong lamp had been disclosed before 01/03/2023 and that it created the same overall impression as the contested design on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268