DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015010721-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-10

000125716

Contested design: 015010721-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150107210001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Puczyński-Mała Architektura Mariusz Puczyńskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Pruszków, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Maciej Paluchowski

Poland (PL)

Sulnowo, Poland

Represented by

Jakub Kubalski

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

prior park bench design shown in the applicant's 2019 street furniture catalogue and later 2021 catalogue as No 180489_02

bench No 13-04-89_02 · Puczyński Mała Architektura Street Furniture 2019 catalogue / applicant website and Internet Archive

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that its earlier park bench design had been disclosed before filing and that the contested design reproduced the same S-profile and slatted overall appearance.
  • The holder disputed timely disclosure, argued the informed user was highly attentive and professional, and claimed differences in armrests, slat spacing and seat arrangement created a distinct impression.
  • The Invalidity Division found the applicant's catalogues, website material and archived screenshots sufficient to prove prior disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • It held that the common S-shaped structure and separated slats dominated the overall impression, the differences were minor, and the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068