DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015022444-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-18

000128315

Contested design: 015022444-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle de l’UE enregistré nº 015022444-0001 est déclaré nul. 3. La titulaire supporte les frais, fixés à EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Anotherwayvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Marseille, France

Represented by

EY Ventury Avocats

Holder · RCD owner

INGA

France (FR)

Paris, France

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnexe 3

Two-sided sponge disclosed on INGA Instagram account

Instagram post of "L’éponge" by INGA · Instagram · disclosed 2022-04-04

Web disclosureAnnexe 5

Ulule crowdfunding page for INGA showing the two-sided sponge in four colours

https://fr.ulule.com/inga-bien-fait/ · Internet Archive / Ulule · disclosed 2022-05-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested sponge design had been self-disclosed more than one year before filing and lacked novelty and, in any event, individual character.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted Annexes 3 and 5 as public disclosures before the relevant grace-period date and treated them as showing the same INGA two-sided sponge product.
  • Given the designer’s broad freedom, the colour and stitching differences did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b), and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. Lewis
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078