DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008389951-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-23

000124855

Contested design: 008389951-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008389951-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Deluxehomeart ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Kolding, Denmark

Represented by

Løje IP

Holder · RCD owner

MRKK ApS

Denmark (DK)

Risskov, Denmark

Represented by

Otello Law Firm

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

electric candle

REUD No 007745252-0001

Web disclosureD2

electric candle

https://www.mynovelty.eu/shop/brand/candled-slim-pillar-candle-s/ · Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) · disclosed 2020-12-29

OtherD3

electric candle

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier electric candle designs D1-D3 disclosed before the filing date and arguing some bottom features were technically dictated.
  • The holder argued D1 had already been invalidated, lis pendens should be considered, D2 and D3 differed in size, colour and flame shape, and D3 had not been properly disclosed.
  • The Division found D2 was validly disclosed through the archived website before the filing date and considered the informed user of electric candles against a broad degree of designer freedom.
  • Minor differences in colour, finish, flame angle and wax recess did not change the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and the application was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268