DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015015898-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-23

000125696

Contested design: 015015898-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015015898-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Volvo Car Corporationvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Göteborg, Sweden

Holder · RCD owner

Skywell Automobile Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (4)

Registered RCDD1

02874677-0003

Registered RCDD2

005817707-0001

Web disclosureD3

photograph of a car showing the relevant headlight trim

https://carnewschina.com/2021/07/27/skyworth-did-it-again-et5-was-suddenly-renamed-to-ev6-upon-launch/ · carnewschina.com · disclosed 2021-07-27

National designD4

CN 306021471 · China

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over D1 to D4, arguing that only the front-visible part of the headlight matters under Article 4(2).
  • Holder disputed the reliability and quality of D3, argued informed users consider more of the product, and said illuminated daytime-running-light features should carry particular weight.
  • The Division accepted D3 as a valid internet disclosure from 27/07/2021 and held that only features visible during normal use of the mounted headlight may be compared.
  • It found the visible front features of D3 and the contested design created the same overall impression, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268