DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004731347-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-25

000124779

Contested design: 004731347-0005

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered EU design No 004731347-0005 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 004731347-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Airtechnic - Chatzoudis Etaireia Periorismenis Euthynisvia PDF extraction

GR

Nea Chalkidona, Athens, Greece

Holder · RCD owner

D.Ellinas Factory Products LTDvia PDF extraction

CY

Limassol, Cyprus

Represented by

Konstantina Diola

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnnex 1

holder's earlier linear grille design for air conditioning

P.V.C. products 2015 · holder catalogue · disclosed 2015-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested air-conditioning grille lacked novelty and individual character over the holder's 2015 catalogue disclosure, and that rear springs were solely functional under Article 8(1).
  • The holder contested disclosure, novelty, and technical-function objections, invoked the Article 7 grace period, and relied on Cyprus court proceedings and its later catalogues.
  • The Division rejected the Article 8(1) attack on the design as a whole, finding only the rear springs purely functional and excluding them from the comparison.
  • The Division accepted the 2015 holder catalogue as prior disclosure, found the remaining differences immaterial under Article 5(2), and declared the contested design invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258