DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004731347-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-25

000124780

Contested design: 004731347-0007

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0047313470007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Airtechnic - Chatzoudis Etaireia Periorismenis Euthynisvia PDF extraction

GR

Nea Chalkidona, Athens, Greece

Holder · RCD owner

D.Ellinas Factory Products LTDvia PDF extraction

CY

Limassol, Cyprus

Represented by

Konstantina Diola

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

linear nozzle shown in an ECOTHERMIKI leaflet extract

ECOTHERMIKI leaflet (Annex 4 / Exhibit 7) · disclosed 2014-08-21

CatalogD2

Linear Bar Grilles

Air Master Equipment Emirates LLC catalogue 'LINEAR BAR GRILLES' (Annex 5 / Exhibit 8)

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the air-conditioning grille design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosed linear grille designs D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued that the prior designs were not properly disclosed, that Article 7 protected the prior disclosure, and that the contested design had individual character.
  • The Division rejected D1 as insufficiently proven and source-uncertain, but accepted D2 based on the third-party catalogue and found no facts excluding EU-sector awareness.
  • Comparing D2 with the contested design, the Division found only minor differences within average designer freedom, so the same overall impression led to invalidity and costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124779

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258