DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008668859-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-07-22

000129242

Contested design: 008668859-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of EU design No 008668859-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 008668859-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Angelika Würznervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Berlin, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

NightDreamer GmbH

Germany (DE)

Berlin, Deutschland

Represented by

Hans-Peter Gottfried

Prior art cited (7)

CatalogAnhang 2⚠ rejected as evidence

'mySheepi Kissen' flyer showing various pillow designs

RECURAS UG

Web disclosureAnhang 3⚠ rejected as evidence

blog posts about mySheepi pillows referenced in an email

https://www.schmerz-im-nacken.de/massnahmen-gegen-nackenschmerzen/die-bestenseitenschlaeferkissen/ ; https://www.schmerz-im-nacken.de/ratgeber-kissen/das-beste-kopfkissen-fuer-kinder-test/ ; https://miks-magazin.com/mittendrin/mysheepi-test/ · schmerz-im-nacken.de; miks-magazin.com

Prior useAnhang 4⚠ rejected as evidence

mySheepi pillows allegedly shown at HEIMTEXTIL 2018 and in related online posts

HEIMTEXTIL Frankfurt/Main / Facebook · disclosed 2018-01-10

Web disclosureAnhang 6⚠ rejected as evidence

mySheepi advertising videos with partial pillow images

crew-united.com links · crew-united.com

Web disclosureAnhang 7⚠ rejected as evidence

'mySheepi fragt nach' campaign video reference

YouTube link · YouTube · disclosed 2019-11-01

Web disclosureAnhang 8⚠ rejected as evidence

SCHLAFONAUT interview and podcast showing different pillows

SCHLAFONAUT

OtherAnhang 11⚠ rejected as evidence

private licence agreement showing earlier pillow designs

Lizenzvertrag mit der RECURAS UG vom 14.02.2017 · licence agreement with RECURAS UG · disclosed 2017-02-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant alleged the contested pillow design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier mySheepi pillow designs had been disclosed since 2017 in flyers, blogs, a trade fair, videos, emails and a licence agreement.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held the evidence did not objectively prove public disclosure under Article 7 and, in any event, the applicant had not clearly identified which specific earlier designs the challenge relied on.
  • Because the invoked Article 25(1)(b) grounds were not substantiated, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067