DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007304225-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-07-28

000127958

Contested design: 007304225-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 007304225-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Rhino Rack Australia Pty Limitedvia PDF extraction

AU

Eastern Creek, Australia

Holder · RCD owner

Ikamper Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

South Korea (KR)

Paju-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Represented by

Ipsilon

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

iKamper Skycamp rooftop tent shown in YouTube screenshots and archived website capture

https://www.youtube.com; https://www.ikamper.com · YouTube / Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2018-02-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the contested rooftop tent lacked novelty and individual character after the holder disclosed the same design online in February 2018.
  • The holder filed observations late and requested continuation of proceedings, but those observations were disregarded because continuation was unavailable in invalidity proceedings at that time.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube and Wayback Machine evidence as public disclosure and found only minor, functional, or non-impactful differences between the prior and contested designs.
  • The contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218