DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009145824-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-08-04

000126217

Contested design: 009145824-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 009145824-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del diseño de la UE registrado n.º 009145824-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del/de la titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hao Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Navima Calzados, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Paterna, España

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Shein 'GORGLITTER H Sandals Cut Out Flat Sandals Women…' sandals

ASIN B 0BN L23 VHL; https://www.amazon.com · Amazon.com · disclosed 2022-01-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant alleged the contested footwear-upper design lacked novelty and individual character over a Shein sandal disclosed on Amazon from 1 January 2022.
  • Holder disputed admissibility and the internet evidence, argued differences in stitching, materials, strap widths, and structure, and subsidiarily relied on Article 7(3).
  • The Division found the translation cured the filing defect, accepted the Amazon page as prior disclosure, and rejected abusive-disclosure arguments because the holder did not prove the Amazon design came from its confidential material.
  • Comparing the relevant upper-part features, the Division found different overall impressions from padding, stitching, texture, and strap proportions, so the design remained novel and individual and the application was rejected with EUR 400 costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129160

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2026-03-17Art 25(1)(b)027
000123314

vs XINMING SHOES MATERIAL CO.LTD

2025-12-23Art 25(1)(b)027
000127175

vs GANNI A/S

2025-12-22Art 25(1)(b)027
000125895

vs Autumnpaper Limited

2025-07-22Art 25(1)(b)027
000123218

vs CM LAUFSTEG MÜNCHEN INTERNATIONAL BRANDS GmbH

2024-12-17Art 25(1)(b)027
000123217

vs CM LAUFSTEG MÜNCHEN INTERNATIONAL BRANDS GmbH

2024-12-17Art 25(1)(b)027
000122154

vs Loro Piana S.p.A.

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)027
000122134

vs Loro Piana S.p.A.

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)027