DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004160273-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-03-17

000129160

Contested design: 004160273-0009

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 004160273-0009 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

New Balance Athletics, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

Boston, United States

Represented by

Simmons & Simmons LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Road Star Groupvia PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Praha 10 - Štěrboholy, Czech Republic

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogExhibit 5

New Balance Model 574 training shoe

ML574MDD · Winter and Fall 2016 product catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 9Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, alleged copyright infringement, and claimed the design offended public policy because it copied the New Balance 574 shoe.
  • The holder argued only the 2016 catalogue predated filing, the compared designs created different overall impressions, copyright ownership and infringement were unproven, and the public-policy theory was legally misplaced.
  • The Division accepted catalogue Exhibit 5 as the only relevant prior disclosure, but found the prominent lateral N element, proportions, and panel structure gave the contested shoe a different overall impression.
  • It also found Article 25(1)(f) unsubstantiated for lack of proof of copyright ownership and applicable French law, and rejected the public-policy ground as outside Article 9 EUDR.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123314

vs XINMING SHOES MATERIAL CO.LTD

2025-12-23Art 25(1)(b)027
000127175

vs GANNI A/S

2025-12-22Art 25(1)(b)027
000126217

vs NAVIMA CALZADOS, S.L.

2025-08-04Art 25(1)(b)027
000125895

vs Autumnpaper Limited

2025-07-22Art 25(1)(b)027
000123217

vs CM LAUFSTEG MÜNCHEN INTERNATIONAL BRANDS GmbH

2024-12-17Art 25(1)(b)027
000123218

vs CM LAUFSTEG MÜNCHEN INTERNATIONAL BRANDS GmbH

2024-12-17Art 25(1)(b)027
000122134

vs Loro Piana S.p.A.

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)027
000122154

vs Loro Piana S.p.A.

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)027