DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005236536-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-09-19

000125798

Contested design: 005236536-0007

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 005236536-0007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Woods & Go Design S.Lvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Beniarjó, Spain

Represented by

Celeste Reig Albiñana

Holder · RCD owner

SMEG S.p.A.

Italy (IT)

Guastalla (RE), Italy

Represented by

Studio Torta S.p.A.

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogExhibit 1

design of the 'FAB32' refrigerator

SMEG catalogue, page 5, FAB32 · SMEG catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested refrigerator lacked novelty and individual character over a prior SMEG design disclosed in a 2011 catalogue, and that designer freedom in refrigerator shape was broad.
  • The holder challenged disclosure and comparability, stressing that the contested registration included interior views and arguing that interior differences and functional constraints preserved novelty and individual character.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the 2011 SMEG catalogue as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR and found that designer freedom for household refrigerators was only narrowly constrained.
  • It found the shared retro two-door exterior created the same overall impression despite unshown interior differences, so the application was upheld, the design invalidated, and costs fixed against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158